Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Great Power Competition results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 817 hits . Analysis detected 6,463 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,387 topics). This Great Power Competition is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Great Power Competition
Topic details
Total words: 7,056
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst