Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,202 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great Outdoors results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 357 hits . Analysis detected 2,983 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,695 of 16,562 topics). This Great Outdoors is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Great Outdoors
Topic details
Total words: 4,808
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst