Topic summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos1,000 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grants results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 761 hits. Analysis detected 4,208 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,000 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,099 of 16,562 topics). This Grants is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Grants
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,000
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.3% percentile
5.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 25.4%25.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 13.5%13.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 16.2%16.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.1%22.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.2%14.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos