Topic summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos1,468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Technology results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 701 hits. Analysis detected 6,131 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,049 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,696 of 16,321 topics). This Government Technology is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Government Technology
Topic details
Total words: 5,049
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.1%6.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos