Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Honan results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 2,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (2,903 of 6,348 authors). This Katie Honan is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Katie Honan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠55%Katie Honan (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,580
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.2%15.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 0.4%0.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos