Topic summary
⁠27%2 analyzed articles/videos760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Response To Fraud results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 651 hits. Analysis detected 5,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,288 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,828 of 16,562 topics). This Government Response To Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Government Response To Fraud
Topic details
Total words: 5,288
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.7% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos