Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Personnel results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, In-Group Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 258 hits. Analysis detected 1,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,825 of 16,562 topics). This Government Personnel is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Government Personnel
Topic details
Total words: 2,592
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos