Topic summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Employees results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 692 hits. Analysis detected 3,549 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,935 of 16,562 topics). This Government Employees is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Government Employees
Topic details
Total words: 2,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.7%27.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 18.6%18.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 17.2%17.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Tu Quoque: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos