Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Government Appointments And Nominations results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 345 hits. Analysis detected 2,342 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,511 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Government Appointments And Nominations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Government Appointments And Nominations
Topic details
Total words: 2,511
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos