Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,413 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Governance Studies results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Overconfidence Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 1,238 hits. Analysis detected 7,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,508 of 16,313 topics). This Governance Studies is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Governance Studies
Topic details
Total words: 5,652
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.2% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 21.9%21.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 15.5%15.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 13.1%13.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.6%7.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 15.5%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos