Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,076 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Governance results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 646 hits. Analysis detected 6,612 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,304 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,180 of 15,437 topics). This Governance is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Governance
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,304
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.0%6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos