Topic summary
⁠90%2 analyzed articles/videos1,147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gordie Howe International Bridge results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 672 hits. Analysis detected 6,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,388 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,782 of 16,562 topics). This Gordie Howe International Bridge is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Gordie Howe International Bridge
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠78%Gordie Howe International Bridge (selected)6%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,388
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 11.8%11.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.4%8.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.1%7.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.2%6.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos