Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video1,356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gop Fundraiser results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 613 hits. Analysis detected 3,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,006 of 15,447 topics). This Gop Fundraiser is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Gop Fundraiser
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,068
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.1%15.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos