Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gold Market results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Recency Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 739 hits. Analysis detected 6,613 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,788 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (2,277 of 16,562 topics). This Gold Market is worse (more manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Gold Market
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,788
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.3% percentile
7.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 26.5%26.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 22.4%22.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 22.4%22.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 16.1%16.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.2%16.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 8.8%8.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 16.5%16.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 26.5%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.2%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos