Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 536 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suzanne O'Halloran results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Anchoring Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 45.2% saturation with 727 hits . Analysis detected 4,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.1% and a BS Rank of 97% (243 of 6,628 authors). This Suzanne O'Halloran is worse (more manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group. Suzanne O'Halloran
Author details
Total words: 1,608
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.3% percentile 12.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 45.2% 45.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 34.6% 34.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 26.9% 26.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 22.6% 22.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 14.5% 14.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 15.0% 15.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 19.8% 19.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.5% 14.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Author 45.2%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 34.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 26.9%, sitewide 4.0% Framing Effect: Author 16.4%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 22.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 19.8%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 15.0%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 14.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Bandwagon: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Gambler’s Fallacy: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst