Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video771 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glucose Monitoring results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Biased Writer Voice, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 371 hits. Analysis detected 2,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (8,806 of 15,882 topics). This Glucose Monitoring is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Glucose Monitoring
Topic details
Total words: 3,084
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.0%12.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos