Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glp 1 results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 512 hits. Analysis detected 3,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,725 of 16,562 topics). This Glp 1 is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Glp 1
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,016
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.8%16.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.0%17.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos