Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Supply Chains results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 1,127 hits. Analysis detected 4,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,024 of 16,562 topics). This Global Supply Chains is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Global Supply Chains
Topic details
Total words: 4,952
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 22.8%22.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos