Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Market Strategy results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 559 hits. Analysis detected 3,832 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,875 of 16,562 topics). This Global Market Strategy is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Global Market Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 2,220
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.6% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 12.7%12.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 8.2%8.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.9%7.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.6%10.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 25.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.5%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos