Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,274 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Energy Markets results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 606 hits. Analysis detected 6,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,096 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,965 of 16,562 topics). This Global Energy Markets is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Global Energy Markets
Topic details
Total words: 5,096
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.7%10.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos