Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video972 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Economics results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 527 hits. Analysis detected 2,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,177 of 16,562 topics). This Global Economics is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Global Economics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,888
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.6%13.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos