Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Disorder results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 2,034 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,326 of 16,562 topics). This Global Disorder is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Global Disorder
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,848
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.8% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 16.2%16.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos