Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Marche results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 300 hits . Analysis detected 2,034 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,605 of 6,629 authors). This Stephen Marche is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Stephen Marche
Author details
Total words: 1,848
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.8% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 16.2% 16.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Author 16.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst