Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Global Competition results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 407 hits . Analysis detected 2,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,205 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Global Competition is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Global Competition
Topic details
Total words: 2,205
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 18.5% 18.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 15.9% 15.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 14.7% 14.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Primacy Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst