Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Cities results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 338 hits. Analysis detected 1,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,704 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,775 of 16,562 topics). This Global Cities is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Global Cities
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠72%Global Cities (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,704
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 19.8%19.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.1%11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 19.8%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos