Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Capitalism results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 1,390 hits. Analysis detected 8,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,011 of 16,562 topics). This Global Capitalism is better (less manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Global Capitalism
Topic details
Total words: 7,652
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.2%18.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos