Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Praveen Kolluguri results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 1,390 hits. Analysis detected 8,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,019 of 6,628 authors). This Praveen Kolluguri is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Praveen Kolluguri
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
55%Praveen Kolluguri (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,652
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 18.2%18.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 18.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos