Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Global Aid results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 661 hits. Analysis detected 5,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Global Aid is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Global Aid
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,252
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 12.1%12.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.6%15.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos