Topic summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video481 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global AI Development results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 285 hits. Analysis detected 1,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,443 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,571 of 16,562 topics). This Global AI Development is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Global AI Development
Topic details
Total words: 1,443
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.4% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 19.8%19.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.0%6.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos