Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These German Economy results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 629 hits. Analysis detected 3,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,183 of 16,562 topics). This German Economy is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
German Economy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,568
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.5%24.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.5%7.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos