Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Bandwagon, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 66.1% saturation with 680 hits. Analysis detected 2,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,029 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,527 of 16,562 topics). This Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets is worse (more manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group.
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
Topic details
Total words: 1,029
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.8% percentile
9.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 66.1%66.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 31.4%31.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 16.1%16.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 16.0%16.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.1%15.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 66.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 31.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 19.2%Bandwagon: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos