Topic summary
2% 1 analyzed article/video 931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgia Runoff Elections results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 132 hits . Analysis detected 540 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,793 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (15,730 of 16,562 topics). This Georgia Runoff Elections is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group. Georgia Runoff Elections
Topic details
Total words: 2,793
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst