Topic summary
⁠50%2 analyzed articles/videos1,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgia Lottery results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 1,068 hits. Analysis detected 3,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (9,649 of 15,769 topics). This Georgia Lottery is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Georgia Lottery
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,720
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 22.6%22.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos