Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Conway results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 2,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ā 73% (4,580 of 16,562 topics). This George Conway is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
George Conway
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 73%George Conway (selected)5%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,304
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.4% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.0%9.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.6%7.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.6%10.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.6%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos