Topic summary
⁠77%3 analyzed articles/videos670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Geopolitical Tensions results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 755 hits. Analysis detected 3,910 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,872 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,714 of 16,562 topics). This Geopolitical Tensions is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Geopolitical Tensions
Topic details
Total words: 2,872
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.6% percentile
5.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.3%26.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos