Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,876 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Geopolitical Impact results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,104 hits. Analysis detected 7,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,504 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (10,066 of 16,562 topics). This Geopolitical Impact is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Geopolitical Impact
Topic details
Total words: 7,504
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.8%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos