Topic summary
⁠31%2 analyzed articles/videos548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Geofence Warrants results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 638 hits. Analysis detected 5,223 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,161 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (12,058 of 16,562 topics). This Geofence Warrants is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Geofence Warrants
Topic details
Total words: 6,161
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos