Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Genre Analysis results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 1,239 hits. Analysis detected 4,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,725 of 16,562 topics). This Genre Analysis is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Genre Analysis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,652
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.5% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 33.9%33.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.7%15.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos