Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Genocide Recognition results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 1,355 hits. Analysis detected 7,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ā 81% (3,246 of 16,562 topics). This Genocide Recognition is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
Genocide Recognition
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 81%Genocide Recognition (selected)6%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,992
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510080.4% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 33.9%33.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.4%10.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.6%16.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.5%16.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.1%25.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.4%13.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos