Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Genetic Disorders results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Framing Effect, and Red Herring, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 440 hits. Analysis detected 885 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,746 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Genetic Disorders is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Genetic Disorders
Topic details
Total words: 2,746
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.0%16.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.1%4.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Special Pleading: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate