Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These General Conference results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 295 hits. Analysis detected 2,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,330 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,089 of 16,562 topics). This General Conference is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
General Conference
Topic details
Total words: 3,330
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos