Topic summary
100% 2 analyzed articles/videos 700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gender Issues results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.4% saturation with 1,952 hits . Analysis detected 10,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,713 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 81% (3,250 of 16,562 topics). This Gender Issues is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Gender Issues
Topic details
Total words: 4,713
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.4% percentile 5.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 40.8% 40.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 41.4% 41.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 19.5% 19.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 17.7% 17.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 21.4% 21.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 41.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 40.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst