Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gender Ideology In Schools results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 1,022 hits. Analysis detected 8,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,373 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Gender Ideology In Schools is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Gender Ideology In Schools
Topic details
Total words: 5,373
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.4%17.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Red Herring: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate