Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gender Ideology In Schools results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 1,022 hits . Analysis detected 8,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,373 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Gender Ideology In Schools is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Gender Ideology In Schools
Topic details
Total words: 5,373
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 17.4% 17.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Red Herring: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst