Topic summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video797 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gender Disparities results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 737 hits. Analysis detected 3,570 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,400 of 16,559 topics). This Gender Disparities is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Gender Disparities
Topic details
Total words: 3,188
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.1%23.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.9%15.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos