Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gdp results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 49.7% saturation with 623 hits. Analysis detected 1,694 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,254 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,017 of 16,562 topics). This Gdp is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
Gdp
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,254
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

94% percentile
025507510093.9% percentile
11.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 49.7%49.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 38.7%38.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.2%15.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.9%8.9%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anchoring Bias: Topic 49.7%, sitewide 4.0%Framing Effect: Topic 38.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos