Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gaza Ceasefire results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38.1% saturation with 2,288 hits. Analysis detected 7,709 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,011 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,751 of 16,562 topics). This Gaza Ceasefire is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Gaza Ceasefire
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,011
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 38.1%38.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.3%24.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 38.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos