Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video512 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gay Bars results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 269 hits. Analysis detected 1,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,563 of 16,562 topics). This Gay Bars is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Gay Bars
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,048
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.4% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos