Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 769 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gay results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and In-Group Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 987 hits . Analysis detected 2,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 72% (4,749 of 16,562 topics). This Gay is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Gay
Topic details
Total words: 3,076
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.3% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 32.1% 32.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Topic 32.1%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Composition/Division: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst