Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gameabove Sports Bowl results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Special Pleading, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 612 hits. Analysis detected 3,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,456 of 16,562 topics). This Gameabove Sports Bowl is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
Gameabove Sports Bowl
Topic details
Total words: 1,968
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.2% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 17.4%17.4%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.2%9.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 31.1%31.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 31.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Special Pleading: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 0.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos