Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Game Masters (gms) results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Burden of Proof , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 511 hits . Analysis detected 3,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Game Masters (gms) is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Game Masters (gms)
Topic details
Total words: 2,844
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 18.0% 18.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Burden of Proof: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.4% Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Tu Quoque: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Middle Ground: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst